This is the property of the Daily Journal Corporation and fully protected by copyright. It is made available only to Daily Journal subscribers for personal or collaborative purposes and may not be distributed, reproduced, modified, stored or transferred without written permission. Please click "Reprint" to order presentation-ready copies to distribute to clients or use in commercial marketing materials or for permission to post on a website. and copyright (showing year of publication) at the bottom.

Employment Law
ERISA
Life Insurance Benefits

Stanley Hoffman, Individually, and on behalf of the Estate of Phyllis Hoffman v. American Society for Technion-Israel Institute of Technology Inc. et al.

Published: Oct. 13, 2012 | Result Date: Aug. 22, 2012 | Filing Date: Jan. 1, 1900 |

Case number: 09-CV-2482 BEN (KSC) Bench Decision –  Defense

Court

USDC Southern District of California


Attorneys

Plaintiff

John P. Stennett


Defendant

Jennifer L. Ghozland
(Gordon & Rees LLP)

Ronald K. Alberts
(Gordon & Rees LLP)


Facts

Stanley Hoffman's late wife was employed by the American Society for Technion-Israel Institute of Technology Inc. (ATS). His wife became seriously ill and was placed on disability leave in November 2007. ATS enrolled Mrs. Hoffman in a First Reliance Standard Life Insurance Co. group insurance policy in November 2007, and a Metropolitan Life Insurance Co. group insurance policy in January 2008.

Hoffman filed suit on behalf of the estate of Mrs. Hoffman against ATS, Metropolitan Life, and First Reliance. Hoffman sought recovery of the life insurance benefits, asserting alternative legal and equitable claims for relief. The defendants moved to dismiss the equitable causes of action.

Contentions

PLAINTIFF'S CONTENTIONS:
Plaintiff contended that both legal and equitable claims should be permitted prior to discovery because it is not known at the pleading stage whether a legal remedy would provide adequate relief.

Result

The Court granted the defendants' motion to dismiss, finding that because Congress already provided an adequate legal remedy for Employment Retirement Income Security Act (ERISA) actions, Plaintiff was precluded from also seeking equitable relief. Thus, his third and fourth causes of action for equitable estoppel and surcharge were barred.


#91745

For reprint rights or to order a copy of your photo:

Email jeremy@reprintpros.com for prices.
Direct dial: 949-702-5390