Unisense Fertilitech A/S, et al. v. Auxogyn Inc., et al.
Published: Oct. 20, 2012 | Result Date: Sep. 14, 2012 | Filing Date: Jan. 1, 1900 |Case number: 4:2011-cv-05065 Bench Decision – Dismissal
Court
USDC Northern
Attorneys
Plaintiff
Edward W. Smithers
(Smithers Law Firm)
Defendant
Daniel J. Bergeson
(Bergeson LLP)
Jaideep Venkatesan
(Bergeson LLP)
Facts
Auxogyn, Inc. is a developer of innovative technologies aimed at improving the success rate of in vitro fertilization treatments. Unisense Fertilitech A/S filed a suit against Auxogyn, seeking declaratory relief of non-infringement, invalidity, and unenforceability of Auxogyn's patent.
Result
The Court dismissed Unisense's complaint with leave to file an amended complaint consistent with its order, finding Unisense had no reasonable apprehension of a patent infringement lawsuit.
For reprint rights or to order a copy of your photo:
Email
jeremy@reprintpros.com
for prices.
Direct dial: 949-702-5390