This is the property of the Daily Journal Corporation and fully protected by copyright. It is made available only to Daily Journal subscribers for personal or collaborative purposes and may not be distributed, reproduced, modified, stored or transferred without written permission. Please click "Reprint" to order presentation-ready copies to distribute to clients or use in commercial marketing materials or for permission to post on a website. and copyright (showing year of publication) at the bottom.

Civil Rights
ADA
Medical Act Sufficiency Requirement

Leslie Napper, Janet Fischer, Jacquie Eichhorn-Smith, Ted Yanello, and Lynda Mangio, on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated v. County of Sacramento, Board of Supervisors of the County of Sacramento, Roger Dickinson, Jimmie Yee, Susan Peters, Roberta Macglashan, Don Nottoli, Sacramento County Department of Behavioral Health Servic

Published: Jan. 22, 2011 | Result Date: Nov. 16, 2010 | Filing Date: Jan. 1, 1900 |

Case number: 2:10-at-00595 Bench Decision –  Equitable Agreement (interim)

Court

USDC Eastern


Attorneys

Plaintiff

Sean Rashkis

Will Schell

Margaret I. Branick-Abilla
(Social Security Administration)

Stuart J. Seaborn
(Disability Rights Advocates)

Antionette D. Dozier
(Western Center on Law & Poverty)

Jay B. Koslofsky

Kimberly C. Swain
(Disability Rights California)

Amy E. Nash

Suzanna Gee

Melinda R. Bird
(Disability Rights California)

William S. Freeman
(Jones Day)

Robert D. Newman Jr.
(Western Center on Law and Poverty)

Kimberly D. Lewis


Defendant

Robert A. Ryan Jr.

Michelle Bach


Facts

For many years, the County of Sacramento has contracted with non-profit agencies to provide outpatient mental health services to adult Medi-Cal recipients in the County, allowing indigent mental health patients to maintain active lives in their communities and avoid hospitalization. The County made plans to terminate its contracts with the non-profit providers, close existing mental healthcare centers, and open its own County-run clinics to provide certain outpatient services.

Disability Rights California, the Western Center on Law and Poverty, and Cooley LLP filed suit against the County on behalf of those served by the programs being terminated.

Contentions

PLAINTIFFS' CONTENTIONS:
Plaintiffs alleged that the County was eliminating essential mental health services in violation of federal and state laws, including the Americans with Disabilities Act, and placing mental health patients at risk of institutionalization through the proposed termination of the contracts with the non-profit providers and the closure of the mental healthcare centers.

Result

On July 21, 2010, Federal District Judge John Mendez granted a preliminary injunction stopping the County from implementing and enforcing its plan. The parties subsequently reached an interim agreement whereby the County would continue to use the existing providers for outpatient services at their current level until at least June 30, 2011. The County would also hire an expert to evaluate the system and make recommendations.


#93327

For reprint rights or to order a copy of your photo:

Email jeremy@reprintpros.com for prices.
Direct dial: 949-702-5390