This is the property of the Daily Journal Corporation and fully protected by copyright. It is made available only to Daily Journal subscribers for personal or collaborative purposes and may not be distributed, reproduced, modified, stored or transferred without written permission. Please click "Reprint" to order presentation-ready copies to distribute to clients or use in commercial marketing materials or for permission to post on a website. and copyright (showing year of publication) at the bottom.

Consumer Law
Consumer Protection
Misleading Advertising

In Re: H&R Block Inc., Express IRA Marketing Litigation

Published: Jan. 15, 2011 | Result Date: May 7, 2010 | Filing Date: Jan. 1, 1900 |

Case number: 4:06-md-01786 Settlement –  $24,400,000

Court

USDC Missouri


Attorneys

Plaintiff

Norman E. Siegel
(Stueve, Siegel & Hanson LLP)

Daniel C. Girard
(Girard Sharp LLP)


Defendant

Catesby A. Major

Craig S. O'Dear

Ellen E. Bonacorsi

John M. Clear

Robert M. Thompson


Facts

A class of consumers filed suit against tax firm H&R Block in relation to the marketing, sales, and purchases of H&R Block's "Express IRA" product.

Contentions

PLAINTIFFS' CONTENTIONS:
Plaintiffs claimed that defendant engaged in misleading practices when marketing and selling the "Express IRA" product. Plaintiffs argued that customers who opened Express IRAs lost money due to defendant's excessive fees for the accounts in relation to interest earned on them. Further, plaintiffs argued that defendant did not sufficiently elucidate the financial potentialities and boundaries of the IRAs, and had knowledge that IRAs were inappropriate investments for the majority of consumers.

Result

The parties agreed to settle for $19.4 million.


#93339

For reprint rights or to order a copy of your photo:

Email jeremy@reprintpros.com for prices.
Direct dial: 949-702-5390