This is the property of the Daily Journal Corporation and fully protected by copyright. It is made available only to Daily Journal subscribers for personal or collaborative purposes and may not be distributed, reproduced, modified, stored or transferred without written permission. Please click "Reprint" to order presentation-ready copies to distribute to clients or use in commercial marketing materials or for permission to post on a website. and copyright (showing year of publication) at the bottom.

Employment Law
Wrongful Termination
Whistleblowing

Sobrero v. Hignell Inc., et al.

Published: Jan. 15, 2011 | Result Date: Dec. 20, 2010 | Filing Date: Jan. 1, 1900 |

Case number: CV147727 Settlement –  $450,000

Court

Butte Superior


Attorneys

Plaintiff

Lawrance A. Bohm
(Bohm Law Group Inc.)

Joseph M. Earley III


Defendant

Rex D. Berry

Erick C. Turner


Facts

Defendant is a family-owned company based in Chico. Defendant has offered property management services and property development services for over 60 years. Defendant employs over 150 employees. Plaintiff was employed as a painter for defendant from May 2004 to July 31, 2008.

In June 2008, plaintiff reported a company-painting foreman for washing paint down a fresh water storm drain with a hose. Plaintiff contacted the Butte County Department of Toxic Substances who investigated, but found no physical evidence of unlawful paint disposal.

A month later, plaintiff complained to company management that he was not given proper protection to work with lead paint at the high school campus. The next day, plaintiff was assigned to a lower paying assignment away from the high school. When plaintiff complained to executive management, his employment ended.

Contentions

PLAINTIFF'S CONTENTIONS:
Plaintiff contended that defendant terminated and refused to hire him because of his report to Butte County and his refusal to work with lead based paint.

DEFENDANT'S CONTENTIONS:
Defendant contended that plaintiff's employment came to an end when he resigned on July 30, 2008 after unleashing an obscenity filled and drunken tirade in a telephone call to his supervisor, complaining that he was not being assigned to higher paying painting jobs. Defendant further contended that it accepted his resignation, and had no knowledge that plaintiff had ever made any complaint to anyone regarding lead paint or any paint spill. Hignell resolved this matter solely to avoid the uncertainty, aggravation, and expense of a trial.

Settlement Discussions

Plaintiff demanded $70,000. Defendant offered $15,000.

Damages

Plaintiff claimed past lost wages of approximately $47,000 and future wages to be determined.

Injuries

Plaintiff claimed emotional distress.

Result

The case settled for $450,000, and a letter of apology to plaintiff from defendant.

Other Information

A mandatory settlement conference was held on Aug. 20, 2010.


#93392

For reprint rights or to order a copy of your photo:

Email jeremy@reprintpros.com for prices.
Direct dial: 949-702-5390