This is the property of the Daily Journal Corporation and fully protected by copyright. It is made available only to Daily Journal subscribers for personal or collaborative purposes and may not be distributed, reproduced, modified, stored or transferred without written permission. Please click "Reprint" to order presentation-ready copies to distribute to clients or use in commercial marketing materials or for permission to post on a website. and copyright (showing year of publication) at the bottom.

Employment Law
FLSA
Wage and Hour

Natalya Shuvalova, Elizabeth Shuvalova v. Joseph Richard Cunningham, Daniel Cunningham

Published: Jan. 29, 2011 | Result Date: Dec. 22, 2010 | Filing Date: Jan. 1, 1900 |

Case number: 3:2010-cv-02159 Bench Decision –  Dismissal

Court

USDC Northern


Attorneys

Plaintiff

Nancy A. Palandati

Peter Goldstone


Defendant

Dow W. Patten
(Smith Patten)


Facts

Natalya Shuvalova and Elizabeth Shuvalova, mother and daughter, sued Joseph Cunningham and Daniel Cunningham, father and son, alleging involuntary servitude in violation of the Trafficking Victims Protection Reauthorization Act (TVPRA). Plaintiffs also alleged violations of the Fair Labor Standards Act (FLSA) and the California Labor Code. Plaintiffs alleged that they were denied minimum wage as required under FLSA and the Labor Code, including failure to pay minimum wage and overtime, among others.

Natalya and Joseph met through a computer dating service in October 2005, and began a two-year relationship prior to Natalya and Elizabeth's arrival in the U.S. in 2008 following Joseph's proposal. Plaintiffs began living with Joseph at his property in Clearlake with Joseph's adult son, Daniel. Natalya and Joseph married in May 3, 2008.

Plaintiffs claimed that defendant, and his adult son, fraudulently lured them from Russia to the U.S. and induced Natalya to marry one defendant and then forced plaintiffs into involuntary servitude at defendant's property in Clearlake, California. Plaintiffs claimed that defendants' verbal and physical threats forced them to perform heavy, outdoor labor on the property.

Defendants moved to dismiss the entire complaint.

Result

The court granted defendants' motion and dismissed plaintiffs' claims. The court held that plaintiffs may rely on their FLSA and Labor Code claims if they prevail on their TVPRA claims, but the FLSA and Labor Code claims cannot proceed as stand-alone cases premised on fraudulent inducement to marry.


#93491

For reprint rights or to order a copy of your photo:

Email jeremy@reprintpros.com for prices.
Direct dial: 949-702-5390