This is the property of the Daily Journal Corporation and fully protected by copyright. It is made available only to Daily Journal subscribers for personal or collaborative purposes and may not be distributed, reproduced, modified, stored or transferred without written permission. Please click "Reprint" to order presentation-ready copies to distribute to clients or use in commercial marketing materials or for permission to post on a website. and copyright (showing year of publication) at the bottom.

Consumer Law
Consumer Protection
Misrepresentation and Deceptive Omissions of Material Facts

Federal Trade Commission v. Countrywide Home Loans Inc., a corporation; BAC Home Loans Servicing, LP, a limited partnership

Published: Feb. 5, 2011 | Result Date: Jun. 15, 2010 | Filing Date: Jan. 1, 1900 |

Case number: CV-10-4193-RSWL-SSx Settlement –  $108,000,000

Court

USDC Central


Attorneys

Plaintiff

Willard K. Tom

John D. Jacobs
(Federal Trade Commission)

Heather Allen

Lucy E. Morris
(Hudson Cook LLP)

Lynette Hotchkiss


Defendant

Brandt Leibe

Jeffrey Spigel

Peter Todaro


Facts

In March 2008, Countrywide Home Loans Inc. ordered property inspections and services for the purpose of protecting its interests in properties. In an effort to do so, Countrywide created subsidiaries to employ vendors to do such work, and the subsidiaries marked up the prices charged by vendors. In July 2008, Bank of America Home Loans Servicing LP (BAC) bought Countywide.

The Federal Trade Commission charged Countrywide and BAC with collecting excessive fees from borrowers.

Contentions

PLAINTIFF'S CONTENTIONS:
Plaintiff claimed that defendant intended to increase its profits based on default-related service fees through its subsidiaries. Plaintiff argued that mortgage servicing companies may not mark up service costs for profits, or charge mortgage holders for unreasonable and inappropriate services. Further, plaintiff claimed that defendant made untrue claims to borrowers about money owed and loan status, and did not inform borrowers in bankruptcy of new charges on accounts.

Result

Defendants agreed to pay $108 million, which will reimburse overcharged homeowners. The settlement also prohibited defendant from making false statements regarding loan accounts, charging unauthorized fees, and charging fees for default-related services, unless reasonable and charged by a third party. Also, defendant must advise consumers if it uses affiliates for services and will alter its bankruptcy servicing policies.


#93498

For reprint rights or to order a copy of your photo:

Email jeremy@reprintpros.com for prices.
Direct dial: 949-702-5390