This is the property of the Daily Journal Corporation and fully protected by copyright. It is made available only to Daily Journal subscribers for personal or collaborative purposes and may not be distributed, reproduced, modified, stored or transferred without written permission. Please click "Reprint" to order presentation-ready copies to distribute to clients or use in commercial marketing materials or for permission to post on a website. and copyright (showing year of publication) at the bottom.

Civil Rights
ADA
Service Dog

Abigayil Tamara v. El Camino Hospital, David Digant

Published: Aug. 17, 2013 | Result Date: Aug. 2, 2013 | Filing Date: Jan. 1, 1900 |

Case number: 5:12-cv-1032 Bench Decision –  Preliminary Injunction Granted

Court

USDC Northern


Attorneys

Plaintiff

Paul L. Rein
(Rein & Clefton)

Catherine M. Cabalo
(Peiffer, Wolf, Carr, Kane, Conway & Wise)

Celia L. McGuinness
(Derby, McGuinness & Goldsmith )


Defendant

Martin J. Everson

Aaron T. Schultz
(Galloway, Lucchese, Everson & Picchi)


Facts

Abigayil Tamara sued El Camino Hospital and David Digant after the hospital refused to allow her service dog to accompany her during a 2001 stay in a locked psychiatric ward. Tamara was a qualified disabled person who used a service dog for independence and mobility. The hospital's current service animal policy prohibited all service animals at its behavioral health units, including the locked psychiatric ward where Tamara stayed.

Tamara sought a preliminary injunction requiring the hospital to admit service dogs. The hospital opposed the motion, arguing that service animals posed a danger that it could not mitigate.

Result

U.S. District Judge Ronald M. Whyte granted Tamara's motion for preliminary injunction. The hospital was therefore precluded from automatically excluding service animals from it's Behavioral Health Units.


#93718

For reprint rights or to order a copy of your photo:

Email jeremy@reprintpros.com for prices.
Direct dial: 949-702-5390