This is the property of the Daily Journal Corporation and fully protected by copyright. It is made available only to Daily Journal subscribers for personal or collaborative purposes and may not be distributed, reproduced, modified, stored or transferred without written permission. Please click "Reprint" to order presentation-ready copies to distribute to clients or use in commercial marketing materials or for permission to post on a website. and copyright (showing year of publication) at the bottom.

Personal Injury
Auto v. Pedestrian
Failure to Yield the Right of Way to a Pedestrian

Bella Vitushkina v. Luminalt Energy Corp., Steven R. Shalendra, and Does 1 through 20

Published: Sep. 7, 2013 | Result Date: Jul. 1, 2013 | Filing Date: Jan. 1, 1900 |

Case number: CGC-12-527167 Verdict –  Defense

Court

San Francisco Superior


Attorneys

Plaintiff

Benjamin Martin


Defendant

Andrew M. Klimenko


Experts

Plaintiff

Edward Rubenstein
(medical)

Moshe Lewis M.D., MBA, MPH
(medical)

George Fogarty
(technical)

Carol R. Hyland M.A.
(technical)

Robert R. Johnson
(technical)

Defendant

James B. Stark
(medical)

Kirsten White M.S., P.E.
(technical)

Facts

On April 12, 2011, 76-year-old Bella Vitushkina was crossing Noe St. at the instersection with 17th St. in San Francisco when she was struck by a van operated by Stephen Shalendra. She suffered injuries as a result thereof and sued Shalendra for negligence, and Shalendra's employer, Luminalt Energy Corp. for vicarious liability. Shalendra was no longer employed by Luminalt and did not appear at trial. As such, the case only proceeded against Luminalt.

Contentions

PLAINTIFF'S CONTENTIONS:
Plaintiff contended that she entered the intersection at a crosswalk and was within the crosswalk when defendant struck her. Thus, plaintiff contended that defendant failed to yield the right of way.

DEFENDANT'S CONTENTIONS:
Defendant contended that plaintiff entered the intersection outside of the crosswalk, stepping out into the roadway from in between parked cars. Thus, defendant contended that plaintiff walked into the van.

Damages

Vitushkina claimed that, as a result of her injuries from the accident, she now required assistance with her daily activities. She also developed depression, mood disorders, and suffered from cognitive decline. Thus, she sought $16.75 million in total damages for past and future pain and suffering and past and future medical costs.

Injuries

Vitushkana sustained crush injuries to the lower portions of her body as well as other fractures. She also suffered a traumatic brain injury and an occipital laceration. She was taken to the San Francisco General Hospital by ambulance. She developed an infection on her left leg while she was at a rehabilitation center, requiring an emergency surgery. She later suffered a fall after she completed nine months of rehabilitation, which she claimed was due to the weakening of her legs caused by the accident.

Result

The jury rendered a defense verdict.

Deliberation

two days

Poll

9-3

Length

10 days


#93891

For reprint rights or to order a copy of your photo:

Email jeremy@reprintpros.com for prices.
Direct dial: 949-702-5390