This is the property of the Daily Journal Corporation and fully protected by copyright. It is made available only to Daily Journal subscribers for personal or collaborative purposes and may not be distributed, reproduced, modified, stored or transferred without written permission. Please click "Reprint" to order presentation-ready copies to distribute to clients or use in commercial marketing materials or for permission to post on a website. and copyright (showing year of publication) at the bottom.

Intellectual Property
Patent Infringement
False Advertising

Hologic Inc. v. Senorx Inc.

Published: May 29, 2010 | Result Date: Feb. 24, 2010 | Filing Date: Jan. 1, 1900 |

Case number: 08CV00133(RMW) Verdict –  Defense

Facts

Plaintiff Hologic Inc. owned MammoSite Radiation Therapy System, creating a market for balloon-based brachytherapy devices for breast cancer treatment. The device was used to deliver a symmetric radiation dose to the margins of the cavity after a lumpectomy procedure. The device's uses were described in three patents assigned to Hologic. Defendant SenoRx Inc. sold the Contura Multi-Lumen Balloon for breast cancer treatment.

Contentions

PLAINTIFF'S CONTENTIONS:
Hologic contended that SenoRx's device infringed on, and contributed to infringement of, their patents. It also alleged that SenoRx violated the California False Advertising and Unfair Competition statutes in marketing Contura, also violating the federal Landham Act.

DEFENDANT'S CONTENTIONS:
SenoRx denied the allegations and filed a counterclaim, alleging the patents were invalid for failure to meet patentability conditions.

Result

The jury rendered a verdict for the defense.

Other Information

FILING DATE: Jan. 8, 2008.


#94177

For reprint rights or to order a copy of your photo:

Email jeremy@reprintpros.com for prices.
Direct dial: 949-702-5390