This is the property of the Daily Journal Corporation and fully protected by copyright. It is made available only to Daily Journal subscribers for personal or collaborative purposes and may not be distributed, reproduced, modified, stored or transferred without written permission. Please click "Reprint" to order presentation-ready copies to distribute to clients or use in commercial marketing materials or for permission to post on a website. and copyright (showing year of publication) at the bottom.

Business Law
Fraud
Misrepresentation

Element Capital LLC v. Maximum Business Innovations Inc., Dakota Holdings Inc., Global Business Systems LLC; Matthew Anderson, Claudia Lopez aka Claudia Leticia Anderson, Commercial Escrow Services Inc., Timothy Gates, Antoinette Hardstone, Ideal Development & Investments LLC, Richard Kryza, Kevin McBride, Pound Hill, Inc., Angela Shaw, Leslie Shep

Published: May 17, 2014 | Result Date: Mar. 17, 2014 | Filing Date: Jan. 1, 1900 |

Case number: 30-2012-00551939 Verdict –  $11,200,000

Court

Orange Superior


Attorneys

Plaintiff

Philip J. Layfield

Christopher D. Walton
(Walton Law APC)


Defendant

Robert Tokar

Curt Craton


Experts

Plaintiff

Dennis Shogren
(technical)

Facts

Element Capital LLC sued Maximum Business Innovations Inc. and others based on allegations of fraud.

Element then sued Maximum Business and many others, before focusing its suit against Matthew Anderson, Claudia Lopez, Global Business Systems LLC, and Dakota Holdings Inc. Dakota was defaulted. Lopez and Global won demurrers against Element without leave to amend. The matter then proceeded to trial only against Anderson.

Contentions

PLAINTIFF'S CONTENTIONS:
According to plaintiff, in 2009, Element Capital worked together with Maximum Business to raise capital necessary to its operations. Maximum introduced Element to Matthew Anderson, who recommended that Element invest in various financial products. As a result, Element lost all of its money.

Element then sued Maximum Business and many others, before focusing its suit against Anderson and other entities connected to him. The matter proceeded to trial only against Anderson. Element contended Anderson had misrepresented himself to them, and that he had no previous experience when he made his recommendations. Element claimed Anderson pretended to be a professional, and claimed he was operating a scam to trick investors. Element further claimed that Anderson made false representations about himself, and the products that Element invested in had all been fake. Element also claimed that Anderson had used fraudulent means to steal money, and then attempted to conceal his misconduct.

DEFENDANT'S CONTENTIONS:
Anderson argued that he had been a legitimate businessman, and that he had been hired by, and relied on, Maximum Business and Kevin McBride to try to find alternate sources of financing for Element. He further claimed that the failure of the monetization process had been Maximum's fault, rather than his own.

Anderson also brought his own cross-complaint against Maximum Business, Kevin McBride, and Ken Kuwabara.

Settlement Discussions

Element demanded $400,000 to settle.

Damages

Element requested $93 million to compensate for its loss of principal.

Result

The jury found that Anderson was liable to Element, and awarded it $11.2 million. Anderson settled his cross-complaint against Kuwabara. The jury also found that Anderson was not entitled to relief against McBride.

Other Information

Entry of judgment in favor of Lopez and Global on the complaint, and a default judgment against Maximum Business on the cross-complaint, are pending.


#94444

For reprint rights or to order a copy of your photo:

Email jeremy@reprintpros.com for prices.
Direct dial: 949-702-5390