This is the property of the Daily Journal Corporation and fully protected by copyright. It is made available only to Daily Journal subscribers for personal or collaborative purposes and may not be distributed, reproduced, modified, stored or transferred without written permission. Please click "Reprint" to order presentation-ready copies to distribute to clients or use in commercial marketing materials or for permission to post on a website. and copyright (showing year of publication) at the bottom.

Intellectual Property
Trade Name Infringement
Statutory Unfair Competition

Kalologie Franchising LLC, Kalologie LLC v. Kalologie Skincare Medical Group of California, David D. Hopp, M.D., David D. Hopp, APC, and Does 1 through 10

Published: May 24, 2014 | Result Date: Apr. 17, 2014 | Filing Date: Jan. 1, 1900 |

Case number: 2:14-cv-00016-DDP-VBK Bench Decision –  $78,257

Court

USDC Central


Attorneys

Plaintiff

Daryl M. Crone

David S. Harris
(North Bay Law Group)

Gerald E. Hawxhurst
(Hawxhurst LLP)


Defendant

Vonn R. Christenson
(Christenson Law Firm LLP)


Facts

Kalologie Franchising LLC and Kalologie LLC sued Kalologie Skincare Medical Group of California, David D. Hopp, M.D., and David D. Hopp, APC, in connection with defendants' spa business.

Contentions

PLAINTIFF'S CONTENTIONS:
Kalologie Franchising claimed that it was a national franchiser of day spas that offered spa services and related products. It sublicensed the right to use the "Kalologie" word to various franchises under a license from Kalologie LLC, which owned the Kalologie word mark.

Plaintiffs claimed that defendants entered into separate franchise agreements with plaintiffs. Defendants then decided to consolidate their businesses. Next, defendants defaulted on their franchise agreements due to certain misconducts engaged in by Hopp. As a result, plaintiffs decided to terminate the franchise agreements with defendants. However, defendants continued to operate their business using the Kalologie mark.

Result

The parties entered into a stipulated judgment, wherein defendants agreed to pay plaintiffs $78,257. Defendants also agreed to a permanent injunction, enjoining them from using the disputed trademark. Additionally, the parties agreed to dismiss David D. Hopp APC without prejudice.


#94524

For reprint rights or to order a copy of your photo:

Email jeremy@reprintpros.com for prices.
Direct dial: 949-702-5390