This is the property of the Daily Journal Corporation and fully protected by copyright. It is made available only to Daily Journal subscribers for personal or collaborative purposes and may not be distributed, reproduced, modified, stored or transferred without written permission. Please click "Reprint" to order presentation-ready copies to distribute to clients or use in commercial marketing materials or for permission to post on a website. and copyright (showing year of publication) at the bottom.

Torts
Product Liability
Asbestos Exposure

Hiroko Felton, as successor in interest to the Estate of Donald L. Felton v. Beach City Chevrolet Company Inc., Maremont Corporation, Davison-Conroy Inc., El Cajon Motors, Ford Motor Company, Hennessy Industries Inc., Honeywell International Inc., Lear Siegler Inc., Pneumo Abex LLC, Toyota Motor Sales USA Inc., and Does 1 through 350

Published: Jun. 7, 2014 | Result Date: Apr. 4, 2014 | Filing Date: Jan. 1, 1900 |

Case number: BC468041 Verdict –  Defense

Court

L.A. Superior Central


Attorneys

Plaintiff

Gary M. Paul
(Waters, Kraus & Paul)

Shawna A. Forbes-King


Defendant

Michael B. Giaquinto
(Hawkins Parnell Thackston & Young LLP)

Edward M. Slaughter

Macy Mei-Yin Chan
(Hawkins, Parnell & Young LLP)


Experts

Plaintiff

Arnold R. Brody Ph.D.
(technical)

William M. Ewing
(technical)

Carl Brodkin
(medical)

Murray Finkelstein
(medical)

Defendant

David H. Garabrant M.D.
(medical)

John Henshaw
(technical)

G. Michael Michael Graham
(medical)

Facts

Hiroko Felton, as successor in interest to the Estate of Donald Felton, sued Beach City Chevrolet Co. Inc., and others, alleging that they caused Donald to develop mesothelioma.

After defendants were dismissed, the case proceeded only against Maremont.

Contentions

PLAINTIFF'S CONTENTIONS:
Plaintiff claimed that since the 1950s, Donald Felton worked at Ace Brake Supply, a brake and clutch manufacturing plant in Los Angeles. Ace purchased brake linings from Maremont Corp., and Felton affixed those linings.

Felton was eventually diagnosed with pleural mesothelioma, and died on April 19, 2013. His estate claimed that they had supplied and manufactured asbestos-containing automobile products. After the other defendants were dismissed from the case, the case proceed only against Maremont. Plaintiffs argued that Maremont's brake linings had contained asbestos, which in turn had caused Donald's cancer.

Plaintiffs asserted causes of action for negligence, strict liability, false representations, intentional tort, and loss of consortium.

DEFENDANT'S CONTENTIONS:
Maremont argued that Donald did not show signs of exposure to asbestos, and that exposure to asbestos in brakes is not known to cause mesothelioma. Maremont further argued that its products were not the cause of Donald's death and that, instead, Ace's failure to provide proper ventilation in its manufacturing plants was to blame.

Damages

Plaintiffs sought $7.5 million in damages.

Result

The jury ruled in favor of Maremont.

Other Information

FILING DATE: Aug. 22, 2011.

Poll

10-2

Length

12 days


#94599

For reprint rights or to order a copy of your photo:

Email jeremy@reprintpros.com for prices.
Direct dial: 949-702-5390