This is the property of the Daily Journal Corporation and fully protected by copyright. It is made available only to Daily Journal subscribers for personal or collaborative purposes and may not be distributed, reproduced, modified, stored or transferred without written permission. Please click "Reprint" to order presentation-ready copies to distribute to clients or use in commercial marketing materials or for permission to post on a website. and copyright (showing year of publication) at the bottom.

Personal Injury
Automobile Accident
Wrongful Death

Laura Escamilla, individually and on behalf of Amanda Escamilla, Miranda Escamilla and Noah Escamilla v. Cox Petroleum Transport, Charles Hillikes

Published: Sep. 19, 2009 | Result Date: Oct. 14, 2008 | Filing Date: Jan. 1, 1900 |

Case number: 07CECG02055 Verdict –  Defense

Court

Fresno Superior


Attorneys

Plaintiff

Peter J. Koenig
(Walker Hamilton & Koenig LLP)

Walter H. Walker III
(Walker, Hamilton & Kearns LLP)


Defendant

Kenneth C. Ward
(Severson & Werson)

Sharon C. Collier
(Freeman, Mathis & Gary LLP)


Experts

Plaintiff

V. Paul Herbert C.P.S.A.
(technical)

Timothy J. Reust
(technical)

Rene A. Castaneda
(technical)

Defendant

Paul Kayfetz
(technical)

Neal L. Benowitz
(medical)

David M. Ingebretsen
(technical)

Robert B. Post Ph.D.
(technical)

Facts

On March 4, 2007, at approximately 1 a.m., Ruben Escamilla, 40, was driving northbound on Cedar Avenue in Fresno when his vehicle rolled. The vehicle came to a rest on its roof, and blocked the southbound lane.

Escamilla was found to have a .17 blood alcohol level. He got out of his car and was standing on the side of the road when a truck driven by Cox Petroleum Transport employee Charles Hillikes crashed into him, killing Escamilla. Escamilla's wife and children sued Cox Petroleum and Hillikes for motor vehicle negligence and wrongful death.

Contentions

PLAINTIFF'S CONTENTIONS:
The plaintiffs alleged that Hillikes was driving the truck in excess of the speed limit, too fast for conditions, and otherwise out-driving his low beam lights such that he was unable to stop prior to colliding with the overturned vehicle in the roadway. This is why Hillikes drove off the road, killing Mr. Escamilla.

DEFENDANT'S CONTENTIONS:
The defense asserted that the employee's conduct before the accident was proper. When the employee saw decedent's overturned vehicle, he applied the brakes but was forced to drive off the side of the road because there were cars in the oncoming lane.

Damages

Plaintiff's counsel conceded decedent's comparative negligence, and asked the jury for a gross verdict of $3.4 million.

Injuries

The plaintiffs claimed injuries included death and loss of society.

Result

The jury found in favor of the defense.

Other Information

AIG insured Cox Petroleum.

Poll

9-3 (rejecting negligence)


#95396

For reprint rights or to order a copy of your photo:

Email jeremy@reprintpros.com for prices.
Direct dial: 949-702-5390