This is the property of the Daily Journal Corporation and fully protected by copyright. It is made available only to Daily Journal subscribers for personal or collaborative purposes and may not be distributed, reproduced, modified, stored or transferred without written permission. Please click "Reprint" to order presentation-ready copies to distribute to clients or use in commercial marketing materials or for permission to post on a website. and copyright (showing year of publication) at the bottom.

Contracts
Breach of Contract
Purchase Agreement

Groner Enterprises Inc. v. American Realty Trust Inc.

Published: Sep. 19, 2009 | Result Date: Jan. 8, 2009 | Filing Date: Jan. 1, 1900 |

Case number: INC040725 Verdict –  $713,550 (reversed, JNOV granted)

Court

Riverside Superior


Attorneys

Plaintiff

James D. Turner


Defendant

Mark W. Edelstein

Mary E. Gilstrap
(Roemer & Harnik LLP)

Brian S. Harnik
(Roemer & Harnik LLP)

Helen P. Dreyer


Facts

On March 7, 2002, plaintiff Groner Enterprises Inc. and defendant American Realty Trust Inc. entered into a written agreement whereby defendant agreed to pay plaintiff a finder's fee of three percent if Cornerstone Development, or any of its affiliates, purchased lots of an undeveloped property that was the subject of a tentative map.

Despite the fact that plaintiff had identified the purchaser, defendant refused to pay plaintiff a finder's fee when it sold the parcel to an affiliate of Cornerstone for $23,785,000.

Contentions

PLAINTIFF'S CONTENTIONS:
The plaintiff contended that he fulfilled his attendant obligations under the contract, and that the parties engaged in a similar course of dealing on various other projects in the past. The plaintiff also alleged that at the time of the agreement, defendant was already in the process of intentionally letting the tentative map to expire so as to render the parcel "unmapped," thereby releasing defendant from its contractual obligation to pay plaintiff a fee for the sale.

DEFENDANT'S CONTENTIONS:
The defendant contended that Groner was not the procuring cause. Groner knew that the map was about to expire, but failed to take any steps that resulted in the ultimate sale. The defense argued that since it allowed the tentative map on the property to expire and thereafter sold the "unmapped" property, that it did not owe plaintiff his finder's fee, as buyer did not technically purchase "lots" as required by the contract.

Damages

The plaintiff sought $713,550, which represented his three percent finder's fee.

Result

Jury verdict in favor of plaintiff for $713,550. Subsequently, the court granted defendant's motion for judgment notwithstanding the verdict, vacating the jury's award. Defendant was awarded costs in the amount of $4,757.

Other Information

FILING DATE: Jan. 15, 2004.


#95405

For reprint rights or to order a copy of your photo:

Email jeremy@reprintpros.com for prices.
Direct dial: 949-702-5390