This is the property of the Daily Journal Corporation and fully protected by copyright. It is made available only to Daily Journal subscribers for personal or collaborative purposes and may not be distributed, reproduced, modified, stored or transferred without written permission. Please click "Reprint" to order presentation-ready copies to distribute to clients or use in commercial marketing materials or for permission to post on a website. and copyright (showing year of publication) at the bottom.

Employment Law
FEHA
Failure to Provide Reasonable Accommodation

Dana Kess v. Department of Recreation and Parks, City and County of San Francisco, and Does 1 through 20

Published: Sep. 26, 2015 | Result Date: Jul. 28, 2015 | Filing Date: Jan. 1, 1900 |

Case number: CGC-13-531728 Settlement –  $96,000

Court

San Francisco Superior


Attorneys

Plaintiff

Kenneth C. Absalom
(Law Office of Kenneth C. Absalom)


Defendant

Andrew M. Gschwind
(Santa Clara Valley Water District)


Facts

Dana Kess sued the Dept. of Recreation and Parks and the City and County of San Francisco, in connection with an employment dispute.

Contentions

PLAINTIFF'S CONTENTIONS:
Plaintiff worked for the Dept. of Recreation and Parks. In 2007, he suffered a workplace injury and underwent several surgeries to repair it. Later, he returned to work and was able to perform the same functions with certain restrictions. Plaintiff claimed that although he was an excellent employee, defendants did not allow him to continue work. Defendants also did not offer him re-employment thereby resulting in his termination or constructive termination. Defendants continued to refuse to return him to active employment.

Plaintiff sued for disability discrimination under Fair Employment and Housing Act, failure to provide reasonable accommodation under FEHA, failure to engage in the interactive process under FEHA, failure to prevent discrimination in violation of FEHA, and wrongful termination in violation of public policy.

DEFENDANTS' CONTENTIONS:
Defendants denied the allegations and asserted various affirmative defenses.

Result

The parties reached a $96,000 settlement.

Other Information

FILING DATE: May 28, 2013.


#95595

For reprint rights or to order a copy of your photo:

Email jeremy@reprintpros.com for prices.
Direct dial: 949-702-5390