Alcoa Inc., et al. v. APC Investment Co., et al.
Published: Oct. 3, 2015 | Result Date: Aug. 12, 2015 | Filing Date: Jan. 1, 1900 |Case number: 2:14-cv-06456-GW-E Bench Decision – Dismissal in part
Court
USDC Central
Attorneys
Plaintiff
Ronald A. Valenzuela
(Lathrop and Gage LLP)
Shawn S. Ledingham Jr.
(Proskauer Rose LLP)
Defendant
Jennifer F. Novak
(Law Office of Jennifer F. Novak)
Facts
Alcoa Inc. and several other plaintiffs sued APC Investment Co., Union Pacific Railroad Co. and other defendants over cleanup costs at a California Superfund site. Union Pacific was the only moving party though most all other defendants joined.
Contentions
PLAINTIFFS' CONTENTIONS:
Plaintiffs alleged that defendants contaminated groundwater in the area of Whittier and Santa Fe Springs with hexavalent chromium and other chemicals. Plaintiffs alleged that defendants should be liable for the cleanup. Plaintiffs also asserted a public nuisance claim.
Result
The court dismissed plaintiff's claim for continuing public nuisance finding that plaintiff's voluntarily incurred investigation costs do not constitute a special injury and that plaintiffs have not suffered an injury to rights held in common with the public and denied plaintiffs' relief, dismissing the action. The case is ongoing, but stayed pending a decision from the Ninth Circuit on another case.
For reprint rights or to order a copy of your photo:
Email
jeremy@reprintpros.com
for prices.
Direct dial: 949-702-5390