This is the property of the Daily Journal Corporation and fully protected by copyright. It is made available only to Daily Journal subscribers for personal or collaborative purposes and may not be distributed, reproduced, modified, stored or transferred without written permission. Please click "Reprint" to order presentation-ready copies to distribute to clients or use in commercial marketing materials or for permission to post on a website. and copyright (showing year of publication) at the bottom.

Consumer Law
Consumers Legal Remedies Act
False Advertising

Tressa Gattinella, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated v. Michael Kors (USA) Inc.; Michael Kors, LLC; Michael Kors Retail Inc.; Michael Kors Stores LLC

Published: Oct. 31, 2015 | Result Date: Aug. 10, 2015 | Filing Date: Jan. 1, 1900 |

Case number: 1:14-cv-05731-WHP Settlement –  $4,875,000

Court

SD New York


Attorneys

Plaintiff

Jeffrey D. Kaliel
(Kaliel Gold PLLC)

Jason H. Alperstein
(Kopelowitz, Ostrow, Ferguson, Weiselberg & Gilbert)

Scott A. Edelsberg
(Edelsberg Law PA)

Wayne S. Kreger
(Law Offices of Wayne S. Kreger PA)

Jeffrey M. Ostrow
(Kopelowitz, Ostrow, Ferguson, Weiselberg & Gilbert)

Hassan A. Zavareei
(Tycko & Zavareei LLP)


Defendant

Leslie G. Fagen

Darren W. Johnson

Walter Rieman


Facts

Tressa Gattinella brought a class action against Michael Kors (USA) Inc., Michael Kors, LLC, Michael Kors Retail Inc. and Michael Kors Stores LLC relating to information contained on price tags for merchandise sold at Kors Outlet stores.

Contentions

PLAINTIFF'S CONTENTIONS:
Gattinella contended that the price tags of items at Kors Outlet stores listed the Manufacturer's Suggested Retail Prices (MSRPs) even though such items were never sold nor intended to be sold at the MSRP price listed on the label. The labels also allegedly included a price term "OUR PRICE" which was lower than the MSRP. Since these items were manufactured to be sold exclusively at Kors Outlet stores, these MSRP prices were fictional creations designed to allow defendants to create "phantom markdowns." She claimed that consumers such as herself relied on this deceptive and misleading labeling and marketing of merchandise to purchase items, believing they were getting a bargain.

Plaintiff brought claims for violations of the California's Business & Professions Code Sections 17200, et seq., violations of the Unfair Competition Law, the California False Advertising Law, and the Consumers Legal Remedies Act.

DEFENDANTS' CONTENTIONS:
Defendants denied wrongdoing and asserted various affirmative defenses.

Result

The parties reached a settlement in which Michael Kors agreed to pay $4.875 million and change the manner in which it displays its price tags by either omitting reference pricing or changing "MSRP" to "Value."

Other Information

FILING DATE: July 25, 2014.


#95776

For reprint rights or to order a copy of your photo:

Email jeremy@reprintpros.com for prices.
Direct dial: 949-702-5390