This is the property of the Daily Journal Corporation and fully protected by copyright. It is made available only to Daily Journal subscribers for personal or collaborative purposes and may not be distributed, reproduced, modified, stored or transferred without written permission. Please click "Reprint" to order presentation-ready copies to distribute to clients or use in commercial marketing materials or for permission to post on a website. and copyright (showing year of publication) at the bottom.

Civil Rights
42 U.S.C. Section 1983
Excessive Force, Negligence

Cartier Anderson v. City of Long Beach, and Does 1 through 10, jointly and severally

Published: Mar. 15, 2014 | Result Date: May 31, 2013 | Filing Date: Jan. 1, 1900 |

Case number: 2:12-cv-01928-VBK Bench Decision –  Defense

Court

USDC Central


Attorneys

Plaintiff

Alexis Galindo
(Curd, Galindo & Smith LLP)


Defendant

Monte H. Machit
(Office of the Long Beach City Attorney)


Facts

On April 13, 2011, Cartier Anderson was running away from Long Beach Police Department police officers and hid in the backyard of a residence. The officers deployed a canine unit. The canines bit the plaintiff.

Anderson sued the City of Long Beach for alleged civil rights violations.

Contentions

PLAINTIFF'S CONTENTIONS:
Plaintiff contended that although he did not pose a threat to the officers, the officers deployed a canine unit. The canines found Anderson, and the officers instructed them to attack him. They bit and attacked Anderson, causing him to lose his left ear.

Anderson asserted causes of action for violations of his civil rights, violations of the California Civil Code, negligence, and assault and battery.

DEFENDANTS' CONTENTIONS:
Defendants' contended that Anderson had been identified as potentially armed and dangerous when police officers approached him. The plaintiff ignored the officers' orders and ran away. Defendants claimed Anderson remained in hiding in a residential neighborhood, while the officers warned him several times that a canine unit was present. The officers contended that they also told plaintiff that if he didn't come out of hiding, the dog would be released and he would be bit. Plaintiff did not come out and was bit when he tried to evade the police canine.

Result

The jury found that the officers' actions did not constitute excessive force.

Other Information

FILING DATE: March 7, 2012.


#95960

For reprint rights or to order a copy of your photo:

Email jeremy@reprintpros.com for prices.
Direct dial: 949-702-5390