This is the property of the Daily Journal Corporation and fully protected by copyright. It is made available only to Daily Journal subscribers for personal or collaborative purposes and may not be distributed, reproduced, modified, stored or transferred without written permission. Please click "Reprint" to order presentation-ready copies to distribute to clients or use in commercial marketing materials or for permission to post on a website. and copyright (showing year of publication) at the bottom.

Civil Rights
First Amendment
Unjust Enrichment

Lindsay Lohan v. Armando Christian Perez aka Pitbull; Shaffer Chimere Smith Jr. aka Ne-Yo; Nick Van De Wall aka Afrojack; J. Records; Sony Music Entertainment; Sony Music Holdings Inc.; RCA Music Group; Polo Grounds Music; Polo Grounds Music Publishing Inc.; Polo Grounds Music Inc.; Mr. 305 Inc.; Mr. 305 Enterprises Inc.; John Doe and Jane Doe 1 th

Published: Mar. 9, 2013 | Result Date: Feb. 21, 2013 | Filing Date: Jan. 1, 1900 |

Case number: 2:11-cv-05413-DRH-ARL Bench Decision –  Defense

Court

SD New York


Attorneys

Plaintiff

Stephanie G. Ovadia
(Law Office of Stephanie G. Ovadia)


Defendant

Audrey M. Pumariega

Marcos D. Jimenez


Facts

"Hip-hop" recording artist "Pitbull," whose real name is Armando Christian Perez, created the song, "Give Me Everything," which contained the lyric, "So, I'm toptoein', to keep flowin', I got it locked up, like Lindsay Lohan." He released the song on March 18, 2011. Later that year, actress Lindsay Lohan sued Pitbull, alleging that his use of her name in the lyric violated her privacy and publicity rights.

Contentions

PLAINTIFF'S CONTENTIONS:
Plaintiff alleged that the song's mention of her name was unwarranted and unauthorized, and referred to her personality, and physical and mental character in an unfavorable manner. Lohan also argued the song was commercial, rather than expressive in content.

DEFENDANT'S CONTENTIONS:
Defendant argued that the song was a protected work of art, which could not withstand First Amendment review. Pitbull also contended that Lohan's name was not used for purposes of advertising or trade.

Result

The Court dismissed the case, finding the song was a protected work of art.


#96047

For reprint rights or to order a copy of your photo:

Email jeremy@reprintpros.com for prices.
Direct dial: 949-702-5390