Chanee Thurston and Tanasha Denmon-Clark, on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated v. Conopco, Inc. dba Unilever (formerly dba Good Humor-Breyers) dba Breyers
Published: Apr. 28, 2012 | Result Date: Feb. 24, 2012 | Filing Date: Jan. 1, 1900 |Case number: 10-cv-04937-PJH Settlement – Equitable Settlement
Court
USDC Northern
Attorneys
Plaintiff
Jennifer Sarnelli
(Gardy & Notis LLP)
Wyatt A. Lison
(Feinstein, Doyle, Payne & Kravec, LLC)
Michael D. Braun
(Braun Law Group PC)
Joseph N. Kravec Jr.
(Feinstein, Doyle, Payne & Kravec LLC)
James S. Notis
(Gardy & Notis LLP)
Defendant
Facts
In three separate lawsuits, plaintiffs filed suit against Conopco Inc. dba Unilever, and Ben & Jerry's, both of which manufactured ice cream, alleging that defendants made false statements when using "all natural" in their advertisements on ice cream.
Contentions
PLAINTIFF'S CONTENTIONS:
Plaintiffs alleged that the "all natural" claims by defendants amounted to false advertising in that the ice cream consisted of coca alkalized with potassium carbonate, which is a man-made, synthetic material.
DEFENDANT'S CONTENTIONS:
Defendants argued that Food and Drug Administration regulations preempted the lawsuit.
Result
The parties reached a settlement, under which Unilever will create a $2.5 million settlement fund and Ben & Jerry's will create a $5 million settlement fund. Also, consumers of Breyers ice cream are entitled to receive $2 per package and no proof of purchase is required for the first three claimed packages. Further, defendants will stop using "all natural" on their ice cream products.
For reprint rights or to order a copy of your photo:
Email
jeremy@reprintpros.com
for prices.
Direct dial: 949-702-5390