Joshua Donnell, a minor, by and through his Guardian Ad Litem Marlene Dixon-Donnell v. Stockton Phoenix Limited, et al.
Published: May 10, 2014 | Result Date: Mar. 12, 2014 | Filing Date: Jan. 1, 1900 |Case number: 39-2010-00248443-CU-PO-STK Verdict – Defense
Court
San Joaquin Superior
Attorneys
Plaintiff
Kenneth N. Meleyco
(Law Offices of Kenneth N. Meleyco)
Defendant
Charles S. Custer
(Gordon & Rees LLP)
Experts
Plaintiff
Dale H. Fietz
(technical)
Defendant
John Sacco
(technical)
Kerry L. Knapp
(technical)
Facts
Two-year-old Joshua Donnell was visiting the Hampton Square Apartments in Stockton, when he was injured after falling from a second-story staircase. Defendant Stockton Phoenix Ltd., owns, operates and controls the Hampton Square Apartments.
Contentions
PLAINTIFF'S CONTENTIONS:
Plaintiff Marlene Dixon-Donnell, Joshua's mother and guardian ad litem, claimed the stair treads were loose at the apartment complex causing the toddler to stumble and fall through railings that were nine-inch wide, to the ground and rocks below. Plaintiff claimed that Joshua hit his head on a rock suffering a brain injury. Plaintiff claimed the railings violated various contracts the owners had signed to receive funds to rehabilitate the property as well as the Uniform Building Code.
DEFENDANTS' CONTENTIONS:
Defendants claimed plaintiff's witnesses' versions of the accident were not credible and that plaintiff did not meet the burden of establishing that any alleged negligence was a substantial factor in the alleged harm.
Settlement Discussions
Plaintiff demanded $7 million.
Result
Defense verdict. The jury determined that while the nine-inch wide stairway railings may have arose to a level of negligence, the evidence was not sufficient to prove that any negligence was a substantial factor in causing the harm claimed by plaintiff.
Other Information
The case was bifurcated, at plaintiff's request, and liability was tried first. EXPERT TESTIMONY: Plaintiff's expert, Dale Howard Fietz, testified that the stairway was unsafe and not in compliance with defendant's contractual obligations. He also stated that the Uniform Building Code did not require defendants to modify the stairway railing. Defense expert, Kerry Knapp, Ph.D., testified that, among other things, the injuries did not support the claim plaintiff fell six to seven feet and struck his head on a rock. John Sacco, defendants' building code expert, testified that the stairway was in compliance with the Uniform Building Code. FILING DATE: Aug. 27, 2010.
Deliberation
six hours
Length
four weeks
For reprint rights or to order a copy of your photo:
Email
jeremy@reprintpros.com
for prices.
Direct dial: 949-702-5390