Employment Law
Retaliation
Disability and Age Discrimination
Salomon Pantoja v. So Cal Value Added, and Does 1 through 10, inclusive
Published: Apr. 26, 2014 | Result Date: Feb. 14, 2014 | Filing Date: Jan. 1, 1900 |Case number: 2:13-cv-02723-R-RZ Summary Judgment – Defense
Court
USDC Central
Attorneys
Plaintiff
Defendant
Spencer J. Davidson
(Wilson, Elser, Moskowitz, Edelman & Dicker LLP)
Facts
Salomon Pantoja sued So Cal Value Added for various employment related claims.
Contentions
PLAINTIFF'S CONTENTIONS:
Pantoja was laid off on Sept. 15, 2011. Pantoja then sued So Cal Value for disability discrimination, age discrimination, and retaliation.
DEFENDANT'S CONTENTIONS:
So Cal Value denied Pantoja's allegations, and asserted various affirmative defenses. Among those defenses, it argued that Pantoja had not presented evidence to support his claims.
Result
The court granted summary judgment for So Cal Value.
Other Information
FILING DATE: April 18, 2013.
#97917
For reprint rights or to order a copy of your photo:
Email
jeremy@reprintpros.com
for prices.
Direct dial: 949-702-5390