This is the property of the Daily Journal Corporation and fully protected by copyright. It is made available only to Daily Journal subscribers for personal or collaborative purposes and may not be distributed, reproduced, modified, stored or transferred without written permission. Please click "Reprint" to order presentation-ready copies to distribute to clients or use in commercial marketing materials or for permission to post on a website. and copyright (showing year of publication) at the bottom.

Intellectual Property
Patent Infringement
Unfair Business Practices

Chao Tai Electronics Co. Ltd. v. Ledup Enterprise Inc. Lowe's HIW Inc.; The Home Depot USA Inc.; Martha Stewart Living Omnimedia Inc., and Does 1 through 10, inclusive

Published: Apr. 26, 2014 | Result Date: Mar. 4, 2014 | Filing Date: Jan. 1, 1900 |

Case number: 2:12-cv-10137-R-MRW Summary Judgment –  Defense

Court

USDC Central


Attorneys

Plaintiff

Franklin E. Gibbs

Gary F. Wang


Defendant

Sean A. O'Brien
(Payne & Fears LLP)

J. Mark Smith

Phillip J. Eskenazi
(Baker & Hostetler LLP)

Patrick S. Park

Jason J. Kim
(Hunton, Andrews & Kurth LLP)

Michael Oakes

Darren B. Schwiebert

Nicholas G. Papastavros


Facts

Chao Tai Electronics Co. Ltd., a Taiwan corporation, filed a patent infringement action against LedUp Enterprises Inc., Lowe's Companies Inc., The Home Depot Inc. and Martha Stewart Living Omnimedia Inc. in relation to U.S. Patent Nos. 7,301,287 and 8,134,298.

Contentions

PLAINTIFF'S CONTENTIONS:
Plaintiff alleged that the '287 patent defined and claims a circuit for LED light string and that defendants infringed the patent by making, importing, distributing, selling, offering for sale and using systems and parts encompassing the invention, and did so willingly in light of plaintiff's patent rights.

DEFENDANT'S CONTENTIONS:
Defendants argued the asserted patents are invalid.

Result

The district court granted defendant's motion for summary judgment of invalidity of the '287 patent. Specifically, it determined that the '287 patent is anticipated by U.S. Patent No. 6,972,528 and is therefore, invalid. As a result, for each claim of patent infringement asserted, the court entered judgment in favor of defendants Lowe's and LedUp, and it dismissed Chao Tai's complaint with prejudice.

Other Information

FILING DATE: Nov. 28, 2012.


#97939

For reprint rights or to order a copy of your photo:

Email jeremy@reprintpros.com for prices.
Direct dial: 949-702-5390