In Re: Incretin-Based Therapies Products Liability Litigation
Published: Jan. 1, 2016 | Result Date: Nov. 30, 2015 | Filing Date: Jan. 1, 1900 |Case number: 3:13-md-02452-AJB-MDD Summary Judgment – Defense
Court
USDC Southern District of California
Attorneys
Plaintiff
Hunter J. Shkolnik
(Napoli Bern Ripka Shkolnik, LLP)
Tor A. Hoerman
(TorHoerman LLC)
Defendant
Richard B. Goetz
(O'Melveny & Myers LLP)
Vickie E. Turner
(Wilson Turner Kosmo LLP)
Facts
Plaintiffs in multidistrict litigation sued pharmaceutical drug makers Merck Sharp & Dohme Corp., Novo Nordisk Inc., Amylin Pharmaceuticals LLC and Eli Lilly and Co. relating to the failure to warn of allegedly harmful side effects from certain Type 2 diabetes medications. They asserted claims for strict liability-failure to warn, strict products liability-design defect, negligence, breach of implied warranty, breach of express warranty, punitive damages, loss of consortium, wrongful death and survival action.
Contentions
PLAINTIFFS' CONTENTIONS:
Plaintiffs, who were prescribed and consumed the diabetes drugs Januvia, Janumet, Byetta, or Victoza, contended that defendants failed to warn that the drugs caused or created an increased risk of pancreatic cancer.
DEFENDANTS' CONTENTIONS:
Defendants argued that plaintiffs' claims were preempted.
Result
The court granted defendants' motion for summary judgment and denied plaintiffs' cross-motion for summary judgment, finding defendants' preemption defense dispositive of plaintiffs' failure-to-warn claims. It concluded that the U.S. Food and Drug Administration would have rejected a reference to pancreatic cancer in product labeling.
Other Information
According to defense, there was a JCCP ruling that also granted defendants summary judgment, issued by Judge William F. Highberger in Central Civil West. FILING DATE: Aug. 26, 2013.
For reprint rights or to order a copy of your photo:
Email
jeremy@reprintpros.com
for prices.
Direct dial: 949-702-5390