This is the property of the Daily Journal Corporation and fully protected by copyright. It is made available only to Daily Journal subscribers for personal or collaborative purposes and may not be distributed, reproduced, modified, stored or transferred without written permission. Please click "Reprint" to order presentation-ready copies to distribute to clients or use in commercial marketing materials or for permission to post on a website. and copyright (showing year of publication) at the bottom.

Torts
Product Liability
Failure to Warn

In Re: Incretin-Based Therapies Products Liability Litigation

Published: Jan. 1, 2016 | Result Date: Nov. 30, 2015 | Filing Date: Jan. 1, 1900 |

Case number: 3:13-md-02452-AJB-MDD Summary Judgment –  Defense

Court

USDC Southern District of California


Attorneys

Plaintiff

Hunter J. Shkolnik
(Napoli Bern Ripka Shkolnik, LLP)

Ryan L. Thompson

Tor A. Hoerman
(TorHoerman LLC)


Defendant

Nina M. Gussack

Richard B. Goetz
(O'Melveny & Myers LLP)

Ana C. Reyes

Aline Fairweather

Vickie E. Turner
(Wilson Turner Kosmo LLP)

Heidi Levine

Douglas R. Marvin

Loren H. Brown

Raymond M. Williams

Kenneth J. King

Amy J. Laurendeau

F. Lane Heard III


Facts

Plaintiffs in multidistrict litigation sued pharmaceutical drug makers Merck Sharp & Dohme Corp., Novo Nordisk Inc., Amylin Pharmaceuticals LLC and Eli Lilly and Co. relating to the failure to warn of allegedly harmful side effects from certain Type 2 diabetes medications. They asserted claims for strict liability-failure to warn, strict products liability-design defect, negligence, breach of implied warranty, breach of express warranty, punitive damages, loss of consortium, wrongful death and survival action.

Contentions

PLAINTIFFS' CONTENTIONS:
Plaintiffs, who were prescribed and consumed the diabetes drugs Januvia, Janumet, Byetta, or Victoza, contended that defendants failed to warn that the drugs caused or created an increased risk of pancreatic cancer.

DEFENDANTS' CONTENTIONS:
Defendants argued that plaintiffs' claims were preempted.

Result

The court granted defendants' motion for summary judgment and denied plaintiffs' cross-motion for summary judgment, finding defendants' preemption defense dispositive of plaintiffs' failure-to-warn claims. It concluded that the U.S. Food and Drug Administration would have rejected a reference to pancreatic cancer in product labeling.

Other Information

According to defense, there was a JCCP ruling that also granted defendants summary judgment, issued by Judge William F. Highberger in Central Civil West. FILING DATE: Aug. 26, 2013.


#98284

For reprint rights or to order a copy of your photo:

Email jeremy@reprintpros.com for prices.
Direct dial: 949-702-5390