This is the property of the Daily Journal Corporation and fully protected by copyright. It is made available only to Daily Journal subscribers for personal or collaborative purposes and may not be distributed, reproduced, modified, stored or transferred without written permission. Please click "Reprint" to order presentation-ready copies to distribute to clients or use in commercial marketing materials or for permission to post on a website. and copyright (showing year of publication) at the bottom.

Employment Law
Breach of Contract
Labor Code Violations

Sean Patrick Edrington v. Deutsche Bank Securities Inc.

Published: Jan. 16, 2016 | Result Date: Nov. 13, 2015 | Filing Date: Jan. 1, 1900 |

Case number: 13-01995 Arbitration –  $175,365

Court

FINRA


Attorneys

Claimant

Joseph R. Becerra

William O. Kampf

William O. Kampf

Paul M. Gleason
(Gleason & Favarote LLP)


Respondent

Robert B. Ericson
(Albert & Will LLP)


Facts

Sean Edrington filed a complaint against his former employer, Deutsche Bank Securities Inc. asserting claims related to his employment with the company. Deutsche, in turn, filed a counter-claim against Edrington related to a promissory note.

Contentions

CLAIMANT'S CONTENTIONS:
Claimant claimed that he should have received a revenue share of $780,000 on an investment banking transaction. Claimant asserted claims for breach of contract, failure to pay wages in violation of the Labor Code, waiting time penalties under the Labor code, unjust enrichment, breach of the covenant of good faith and fair dealing, conversion, intentional interference with prospective economic advantage, and unlawful business practices in violation of the Business and Professions Code. Claimant denied respondent/counter-claimant's allegations and, likewise, asserted various affirmative defenses.

RESPONDENT'S CONTENTIONS:
Respondent denied the allegations and asserted various affirmative defenses. In its counter-claim, respondent/counter-claimant asserted claims for breach of contract/promissory note and common counts and equitable relief with respect to a promissory note claimant/counter-respondent executed in November 2007.

Damages

Edrington requested $780,000 on his revenue share claim and additional in compensatory and punitive damages as well as fees and costs. Deutsche, meanwhile, sought the principal amount of $127,278, plus interest and fees and costs.

Result

The FINRA Panel found Deutsche Bank Securities liable to Edrington for $10,000 for unreasonable delay in making and communicating its decision that Edrington would not receive a revenue share on an investment banking transaction. Edrington, meanwhile, was found liable to Deutsche for the amount of unpaid principal of $167,278, plus interest of $8,087, and $10,000 in fees. After the offset, Edrington was found liable to Deutsche Bank Securities in the sum of $175,365.

Other Information

ARBITRATORS: Herbert Murez, Benjamin F. Breslauer, Brant Jackson Griffin. FILING DATE: July 2, 2013.


#98367

For reprint rights or to order a copy of your photo:

Email jeremy@reprintpros.com for prices.
Direct dial: 949-702-5390