This is the property of the Daily Journal Corporation and fully protected by copyright. It is made available only to Daily Journal subscribers for personal or collaborative purposes and may not be distributed, reproduced, modified, stored or transferred without written permission. Please click "Reprint" to order presentation-ready copies to distribute to clients or use in commercial marketing materials or for permission to post on a website. and copyright (showing year of publication) at the bottom.

Government
Benefits
Judicial Salaries

Robert M. Mallano, individually, and on behalf of a class of similarly situated persons v. John Chiang, Controller of the State of California, The Judges' Retirement System, Administered by the Board of Administration of the Public Employees Retirement System of the State of California, The Judges' Retirement System II, Administered by the Board of

Published: Jan. 30, 2016 | Result Date: Dec. 16, 2015 | Filing Date: Jan. 1, 1900 |

Case number: BC533770 Bench Decision –  Plaintiff

Court

L.A. Superior Central


Attorneys

Plaintiff

William J. Casey
(Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom LLP)

Pramode Chiruvolu

James P. Schaefer

Raoul D. Kennedy
(Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom LLP)


Defendant

Jonathan E. Rich


Facts

Robert Mallano, a retired Justice of the California Court of Appeal, brought a class action complaint for declaratory relief seeking a declaration relating to judicial salaries and benefits for fiscal years 2008-2009 through 2014-2015.

Contentions

PLAINTIFF'S CONTENTIONS:
Mallano contended that despite a mandatory provision in the California Government Code (Section 68203), governing judicial salary increases, the state refused to pay constitutionally and statutorily mandated judicial salaries and benefits. Plaintiff sought a declaration of what the correct judicial salaries were during each year of underpayment.

DEFENDANTS' CONTENTIONS:
Defendants denied the material allegations of the complaint and asserted various affirmative defenses.

Result

The court concluded that plaintiff met his burden of proof to establish entitlement to declaratory relief regarding the appropriate increases in judicial salaries and benefits. The court also found that defendants failed to pay mandated salaries to judges, justices and judicial retirees since fiscal year 2008-2009. Therefore, Mallano and the class were entitled to unpaid salaries, benefits, and interest at 10 percent per annum on the unpaid salaries and benefits. The court also found Mallano was entitled to attorney fees.

Other Information

FILING DATE: Jan. 21, 2014.


#98428

For reprint rights or to order a copy of your photo:

Email jeremy@reprintpros.com for prices.
Direct dial: 949-702-5390