This is the property of the Daily Journal Corporation and fully protected by copyright. It is made available only to Daily Journal subscribers for personal or collaborative purposes and may not be distributed, reproduced, modified, stored or transferred without written permission. Please click "Reprint" to order presentation-ready copies to distribute to clients or use in commercial marketing materials or for permission to post on a website. and copyright (showing year of publication) at the bottom.

Insurance
Coverage
Auto v. Pedestrian

Charlene Diane Castro, as Guardian Ad Litem for minor, Aaron Daniel Castro v. Daniel Matthew Soto, Tammy M. Soto and M Auto Center West

Published: Jun. 2, 2007 | Result Date: Apr. 2, 2007 | Filing Date: Jan. 1, 1900 |

Case number: 1-04-cv-032812 Settlement –  $750,000

Court

Santa Clara Superior


Attorneys

Plaintiff

Mark A. Sigala
(Corsiglia, McMahon & Allard LLP)

Timothy D. McMahon
(Corsiglia, McMahon & Allard LLP)


Defendant

Paul E. Stephan
(Selman Breitman LLP)

Steven D. Werth
(Allen, Glaessner, Hazelwood & Werth LLP)

William H. Gavin

James C. Haigh


Experts

Plaintiff

Rajeev Kelkar Ph.D.
(technical)

Eugene D. Dellamaggiore Jr.
(medical)

Defendant

David C. Bradshaw M.D.
(medical)

Facts

Aaron Daniel Castro, 14, was crossing a San Jose street with a friend when he was struck by a car driven by Daniel Matthew Soto. Soto did not stop but went home where his wife advised him to return to the scene. He obliged and was not charged with a hit and run felony. Castro, who was injured, sued M Auto West Corporation and Tammy and Daniel Soto for negligent operation of a motor vehicle, and vicarious liability.

Contentions

PLAINTIFF'S CONTENTIONS:
The plaintiff argued the Sotos obtained the car earlier in the day from M Auto Center West and that the staff mistakenly did not transfer ownership to Tammy Soto, and that M Auto's insurance carrier insured Soto as a permissive user for their $1,000,000 limits.

DEFENDANTS' CONTENTIONS:
M Auto Center West argued that the insurance policy covered only permissive users of the car, and not customers. The plaintiff countered by arguing that Daniel Soto was considered a permissive user of the car, since he did not buy it and wasn't a customer, and that he should have been covered under the insurance policy.

Specials in Evidence

The plaintiff sought $87,000 in past medical expenses, and up to $30,000 in future medical expenses, as well as unspecified damages for past and future pain and suffering.

Injuries

Aaron Castro broke his left femur at the knee joint, as well as his pelvis. This required two surgeries, one involving arresting the growth plate in both knees to ensure his right left would not grow longer than the left. Aaron could not walk for two months and needed six months of rehabilitation. He was also unable to play football or any other contact sports. He allegedly needed to have future surgery and that he was shorter than he was supposed to be.

Result

During the first day of trial, the judge entered a $750,000 stipulated judgment with the understanding that plaintiff would pursue M Auto Center West's insurance $1 million policy, arguing that Soto was a permissive user and not a customer. Aaron also recovered $50,000 from settlement agreements with Tammy and Daniel Soto's insurance carrier, as well as $15,000 from the Clarendon policy with M Auto Center West.


#98555

For reprint rights or to order a copy of your photo:

Email jeremy@reprintpros.com for prices.
Direct dial: 949-702-5390