This is the property of the Daily Journal Corporation and fully protected by copyright. It is made available only to Daily Journal subscribers for personal or collaborative purposes and may not be distributed, reproduced, modified, stored or transferred without written permission. Please click "Reprint" to order presentation-ready copies to distribute to clients or use in commercial marketing materials or for permission to post on a website. and copyright (showing year of publication) at the bottom.

Securities
Fraud
Misrepresentation

Securities and Exchange Commission v. John J. Todd, Robert D. Manza

Published: Jul. 21, 2007 | Result Date: Mar. 7, 2007 | Filing Date: Jan. 1, 1900 |

Case number: 3:03-cv-02230-BEN-WMC Verdict –  Liability only

Court

USDC Southern District of California


Attorneys

Plaintiff

John B. Bulgozdy
(Securities and Exchange Commission)

Brian N. Mitchell

Karen L. Matteson

David J. VanHavermaat
(U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission)


Defendant

Robert D. Rose

James L. Sanders
(Reed Smith LLP)


Experts

Plaintiff

Jerry Arnold
(technical)

Defendant

Michael Mulligan
(technical)

J. Duross O'Bryan
(technical)

Facts

The Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) sued John Todd and Robert Manza for alleged violations of federal securities law. The SEC claimed Todd and Manza engaged in a fraudulent revenue and earnings manipulation scheme to meet analysts' expectations for their company, Gateway Inc. As a result, Gateway's investors were deprived of material information regarding the business' success.

Contentions

PLAINTIFFS' CONTENTIONS:
The plaintiffs contended defendants made material omissions and misrepresentations in their accounting and reported revenue. The plaintiffs also contended that the defendants misled investors by announcing increased consumer sales without disclosing the sales were made to risky credit candidates in order to prop up sales.

DEFENDANTS' CONTENTIONS:
The defendants denied the charges.

Damages

The plaintiffs sought permanent injunctions, disgorgement and civil penalties.

Result

For plaintiff. Remedy to be determined.

Other Information

On May 30, 2007, the court granted defendant Todd's motion for judgment as a matter of law as to the section 17(a), 10(b), Rule 10b-5 and Rule 13b2-2 claims. The court granted defendant Manza's motion for judgment as a matter of law as to the section 10(b), Rule 10b-5 and Rule 13b2-2 claims. The court granted plaintiff SEC's motion for relief as to civil penalties in the amount of $10,5000 against Manza and $16,500 against Todd. The court denied the SEC's motion for permanent injunction, officer and director bar and disgorgement and denied their motion for a new trial as to the Section 17(a), 10(b) and Rule 10b-(5) claims without prejudice, and the remaining claims with prejudice.

Deliberation

one day

Poll

8-0

Length

three weeks


#98622

For reprint rights or to order a copy of your photo:

Email jeremy@reprintpros.com for prices.
Direct dial: 949-702-5390