This is the property of the Daily Journal Corporation and fully protected by copyright. It is made available only to Daily Journal subscribers for personal or collaborative purposes and may not be distributed, reproduced, modified, stored or transferred without written permission. Please click "Reprint" to order presentation-ready copies to distribute to clients or use in commercial marketing materials or for permission to post on a website. and copyright (showing year of publication) at the bottom.

Employment Law
Disability Discrimination
Failure to Accommodate

Anthony Kuchta v. Neopost Inc., a California Corporation, Neopost Group SA, Scot Stern, an Individual, Patrick Nangle, an Individual, and Does 1-25 Inclusive

Published: Jul. 21, 2007 | Result Date: Apr. 18, 2007 | Filing Date: Jan. 1, 1900 |

Case number: RG05232874 Verdict –  Defense

Court

Alameda Superior


Attorneys

Plaintiff

Daniel L. Feder
(Law Offices of Daniel Feder)


Defendant

James R. Ballard


Experts

Plaintiff

Marc A. Cohen M.D.
(technical)

Facts

Anthony Kuchta was Vice President of Sales at Neopost Inc. He developed a general anxiety that included a fear of flying. Neopost made accommodations to allow him to fly less. When it eliminated his position, Neopost offered him a new position as Vice President of Direct Sales, but warned him it required extensive travel without the previous accommodations. Kuchta declined this position and two subsequent offers, demanding a severance package instead. He was terminated when negotiations broke down. Kuchta sued Neopost for failure to accommodate and disability discrimination.

Contentions

PLAINTIFF'S CONTENTIONS:
The plaintiff contended defendant terminated his employment because he feared flying and denied him the same accommodations that would have allowed him to accept the new positions.

DEFENDANT'S CONTENTIONS:
The defendant contended that travel was an integral function of the new job, which plaintiff could not perform even with accommodations. The two other job offers were reasonable accommodations.

Damages

$650,000 to $2.5 million for past and future lost wages and loss of stock options, plus an unspecified demand for emotional distress.

Result

Defense.

Poll

12-0 (discrimination), 12-0 (discrimination), 11-1 (failure to accomodate)


#98650

For reprint rights or to order a copy of your photo:

Email jeremy@reprintpros.com for prices.
Direct dial: 949-702-5390