This is the property of the Daily Journal Corporation and fully protected by copyright. It is made available only to Daily Journal subscribers for personal or collaborative purposes and may not be distributed, reproduced, modified, stored or transferred without written permission. Please click "Reprint" to order presentation-ready copies to distribute to clients or use in commercial marketing materials or for permission to post on a website. and copyright (showing year of publication) at the bottom.

Intellectual Property
Patent Infringement
Object Interaction

Eolas Technologies Incorporated v. Adobe Systems Incorporated, Amazon.com Inc., Apple Inc., Argosy Publishing Inc., Blockbuster Inc., CDW Corporation, Citigroup Inc., Ebay Inc., Frito-Lay Inc., The Go Daddy Group Inc., Google Inc., J.C. Penney Company Inc., JPMorgan Chase & Co., New Frontier Media Inc., Office Depot Inc., Perot Systems Corp., Playb

Published: Mar. 31, 2012 | Result Date: Feb. 9, 2012 | Filing Date: Jan. 1, 1900 |

Case number: 6:2009-cv-00446 Verdict –  Defense

Court

USDC Texas


Attorneys

Plaintiff

Douglas A. Cawley

John F. Garvish II

Joshua W. Budwin

Gayle R. Klein

Mike McKool Jr.
(McKool Smith)


Defendant

Jeffrey G. Homrig
(Latham & Watkins LLP)

Douglas W. McClellan
(Weil, Gotshal & Manges LLP)

Jennifer Haltom Doan

Michael E. Jones

Douglas E. Lumish
(Latham & Watkins LLP)


Facts

Eolas Technologies Inc. filed suit against various defendants for patent infringement. Eolas alleged that their patents covered virtually every way of interacting with "objects" on the modern "interactive web."

Result

The jury ruled for the defense and found Eolas' patents to be invalid.


#99180

For reprint rights or to order a copy of your photo:

Email jeremy@reprintpros.com for prices.
Direct dial: 949-702-5390