This is the property of the Daily Journal Corporation and fully protected by copyright. It is made available only to Daily Journal subscribers for personal or collaborative purposes and may not be distributed, reproduced, modified, stored or transferred without written permission. Please click "Reprint" to order presentation-ready copies to distribute to clients or use in commercial marketing materials or for permission to post on a website. and copyright (showing year of publication) at the bottom.

Employment Law
FEHA
Gender Discrimination, Disability Discrimination

Sonya Knudsen v. City and County of San Francisco, San Francisco International Airport, John Martin, Blake Summers

Published: Jan. 10, 2015 | Result Date: Jul. 18, 2014 | Filing Date: Jan. 1, 1900 |

Case number: 3:12-cv-01944-JST Settlement –  $465,000

Court

USDC Northern


Attorneys

Plaintiff

John H. Scott

Lizabeth N. N. de Vries


Defendant

Lisa B. Berkowitz
(Office of the San Francisco City Attorney)

Samantha W. Zutler

Arthur A. Hartinger
(Renne Public Law Group)


Facts

Sonya Knudsen sued the City and County of San Francisco, San Francisco International Airport, John Martin, and Blake Summers, in connection with her employment at the airport.

Martin was the Director of the airport and responsible for the day-to-day operations. Summers was the Director and Chief Curator, and was also responsible for day-to-day operations, including management of the staff.

Contentions

PLAINTIFF'S CONTENTIONS:
Plaintiff alleged that she worked as a Curator IV with the airport. Plaintiff alleged that in March 2007, she was seriously injured in an auto accident. She requested, and was approved for, medical leave under the Family Medical Leave Act and California Family Rights Act. Few months later, she was involved in another auto accident, a head-on auto accident, and re-injured herself.

Plaintiff alleged that she requested for reasonable accommodations, including taking part-time work following her accident, but Summers advised her that she could only return on full-time basis. However, plaintiff claimed that requests for accommodations by male employees were routinely granted. Plaintiff also claimed that she was passed up for promotion in favor of male counterparts who had less experience than she had. From July 2010 to Dec. 31, 2011, her supervisor harassed and discriminated against her, creating a hostile working environment.

Plaintiff alleged discrimination based on gender and retaliation. She asserted causes of action for violation of her equal protection rights under 42 U.S. Section 1983, retaliation under Section 1983, gender discrimination under the Fair Employment and Housing Act, disability discrimination under FEHA, and retaliation under FEHA.

DEFENDANTS' CONTENTIONS:
Defendants moved for summary judgment, arguing that plaintiff failed to raise triable issue of material fact with respect to her claim. Alternatively, defendants moved to dismiss her complaint.

Result

The parties reached a $465,000 settlement.


#99516

For reprint rights or to order a copy of your photo:

Email jeremy@reprintpros.com for prices.
Direct dial: 949-702-5390