This is the property of the Daily Journal Corporation and fully protected by copyright. It is made available only to Daily Journal subscribers for personal or collaborative purposes and may not be distributed, reproduced, modified, stored or transferred without written permission. Please click "Reprint" to order presentation-ready copies to distribute to clients or use in commercial marketing materials or for permission to post on a website. and copyright (showing year of publication) at the bottom.

Personal Injury
Product Liability
Design Defects

Ramiro Serrano v. Amrep Inc.

Published: Aug. 19, 2006 | Result Date: May 12, 2006 | Filing Date: Jan. 1, 1900 |

Case number: SC083310 Verdict –  $1,740,700

Court

L.A. Superior Malibu


Attorneys

Plaintiff

Roger L. Gordon
(Gordon, Edelstein, Krepack, Grant, Felton & Goldstein LLP)

Vincent F. Bennett


Defendant

Michael Ayers

Timothy X. Lane


Experts

Plaintiff

Alfred M. Bloch
(medical)

Harvey Cohen
(technical)

Martin J. Siegel
(technical)

Tamara Hunt
(technical)

Fred J. Goldsmith
(technical)

Phillip Sobol
(medical)

Donna Barras
(medical)

Defendant

Anthony C. Stein Ph.D.
(technical)

Mack A. Quan
(technical)

Facts

On Feb. 11, 2003, the plaintiff, a 45-year-old, married with four children, and a 17-year refuse collector, was hit in the back of the neck by a 500-pound refuse container that accidentally slipped off the forks of a front loading refuse truck when the plaintiff's co-employee helper misjudged and overcorrected the controls of the forks when the container was over six feet in the air. This resulted in the container slipping off the forks and hitting the plaintiff who was about 10-to-12 feet away. Amrep Inc. manufactured the loading refuse truck.

Contentions

PLAINTIFF'S CONTENTIONS:
The plaintiff contended that the front loader had a design defect in that it allowed an unsecured heavy load to come off the forks when it was overhead. The plaintiff claimed that there was technologically feasible design alternatives that could have prevented the accident, such as automatic fork leveling, fork hooks, a grabber, or increasing the coefficient of the forks to prevent slipping when forks were below horizontal.

DEFENDANT'S CONTENTIONS:
The defendant contended that the accident was the sole fault of the plaintiff for not being attentive and being in a position where he could be hit by the load and the co-employee for not properly operating the fork controls and that the design alternatives were not practical.

Settlement Discussions

The plaintiff made a C.C.P. Section 998 demand of $750,000; the defendant offered $150,000.

Injuries

The plaintiff sustained a C-1 Jefferson fracture necessitating a three-level fusion of the cervical spine. The plaintiff claimed total disability.

Other Information

The defendant was found 30 percent at fault and employer was found 20 percent at fault. The plaintiff was awarded $195,000 for costs and interest pursuant to C.C.P. Section 998. The defendant filed motions for new trial and judgment notwithstanding the verdict.

Deliberation

one day

Poll

9-3 (liability on design defect), 12-0 (damages)

Length

12 days


#99769

For reprint rights or to order a copy of your photo:

Email jeremy@reprintpros.com for prices.
Direct dial: 949-702-5390