Frankie Centner v. Dennis Stout, Clyde Boyd, Daniel Lough, Barry Bruins, Gene Williams, The County of San Bernardino, Office of the District Attorney of San Bernardino County
Published: Oct. 7, 2006 | Result Date: Apr. 11, 2006 | Filing Date: Jan. 1, 1900 |Case number: 5:99-cv-00087-CJC-CT Verdict – $3,424
Court
USDC Central
Attorneys
Plaintiff
Kirk D. Hanson
(Jackson Hanson LLP)
Defendant
Joseph Arias
(Arias & Lockwood)
Dennis E. Wagner
(Wagner Zemming Christensen LLP)
Facts
In 1995, Dennis Stout was elected as the new district attorney of San Bernardino County. Soon thereafter, Frankie Centner, a case worker for the district attorney's office, and other county employees, sent an anonymous letter to the County Board of Supervisors and the media. The letter charged Stout with acting unethically while sitting in his official position. An investigation led by Assistant District Attorney Daniel Lough ensued. Centner resigned in 1998. She filed a lawsuit against San Bernardino County, The San Bernardino District Attorney's Office, Barry Buins and Gene Williams (two D.A.'s office employees), Stout, and Clyde Boyd, her supervisor. Centner's lawsuit alleged retaliation for criticising the DA's office. Buins and Williams were later dismissed from the lawsuit.
Contentions
PLAINTIFF'S CONTENTIONS:
The plaintiff had a right to criticize the D.A.'s office pursuant to the 1st Amendment. The plaintiff claimed her supervisor, Boyd, retaliated against her by denying her a promotion after suspecting she was involved in disseminating the anonymous letter. The plaintiff also claimed that she witnessed Boyd having an affair with a coworker. As a result, she alleged sexual harassment and a hostile work environment against the county. Those claims were brought under the FEHA and the state whistleblower statutes. The FEHA claims were dismissed by the court under Rule 50(a).
DEFENDANT'S CONTENTIONS:
The defendants claimed that the allegations in the anonymous letter were false, so it was not protected speech. Further, the decisions to promote other more qualified employees instead of the plaintiff were made by county personnel officials, not the defendants. Thus, the plaintiff's retaliation allegation was unfounded. The defense challenged the amount of damages sought by the plaintiff by indicating that in bankruptcy documents, the plaintiff stated that the value of her lawsuit was $3,424.
Specials in Evidence
$660,000 reflecting what the plaintiff would have earned until retirement had she been promoted.
Damages
The plaintiff claimed emotional distress and requested $1,340,000.
Result
$3,424 awarded to the plaintiff on the First Amendment claim against defendant Boyd. The other defendants were cleared of liability on all claims.
Other Information
Plaintiff requested $690,000 in attorney's fees, but was only awarded $57,000. Plaintiff has appealed to the 9th Circuit following an order denying her a new trial. Boyd has cross-appealed from an order denying him qualified immunity and JNOV.
Deliberation
one day
Poll
9-0 (as to Stout), 9-0 (as to Lough), 9-0 (as to county), 9-0 (as to Boyd)
Length
two weeks
For reprint rights or to order a copy of your photo:
Email
jeremy@reprintpros.com
for prices.
Direct dial: 949-702-5390