Samuel R. Vanover, individually and on behalf of a class of similarly situated individuals v. Helio LLC, a Delaware limited liability company
Published: Oct. 30, 2010 | Result Date: Sep. 20, 2010 | Filing Date: Jan. 1, 1900 |Case number: BC414842 Settlement – $950,000 Settlement Fund
Court
L.A. Superior Central West
Attorneys
Plaintiff
Sean P. Reis
(Reis Law Firm APC)
Defendant
Raoul D. Kennedy
(Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom LLP)
Facts
A class action was filed against Helio LLC by Samuel Vanover on behalf of similarly situated individuals, regarding flat-rate early termination fees.
Settlement class members included all current and former Helio customers who, at any time prior to Oct. 4, 2010, were under a contract with Helio that contained the early termination fee (ETF) provision.
Contentions
PLAINTIFF'S CONTENTIONS:
The class contended that the $175 flat-rate termination fees constitute unjust enrichment and was violative of the California Consumer Legal Remedies Act, California Civil Code Section 1671, and California's Unfair Competition Law.
DEFENDANT'S CONTENTIONS:
Helio denied any wrongdoing.
Result
The parties reached a settlement, under which Helio established a $950,000 fund for the payment of refunds to members of the settling class. Customers were qualified to receive a portion of the settlement amount if they were under contract with Helio at any time prior to Oct. 4, 2010 and the contract had an ETF provision, whether or not a member paid any portion of the ETF to Helio or any third party collection agency. Settlement class members were eligible to received a cash award of $10 or a refund equal to the difference between the flat-rate ETF they paid and what they would have paid had the ETF been pro-rated. In reaching the settlement, Helio made no admission of liability.
For reprint rights or to order a copy of your photo:
Email
jeremy@reprintpros.com
for prices.
Direct dial: 949-702-5390