This is the property of the Daily Journal Corporation and fully protected by copyright. It is made available only to Daily Journal subscribers for personal or collaborative purposes and may not be distributed, reproduced, modified, stored or transferred without written permission. Please click "Reprint" to order presentation-ready copies to distribute to clients or use in commercial marketing materials or for permission to post on a website. and copyright (showing year of publication) at the bottom.

Consumer Law
Unfair Business Practices
Early Termination Fees

Samuel R. Vanover, individually and on behalf of a class of similarly situated individuals v. Helio LLC, a Delaware limited liability company

Published: Oct. 30, 2010 | Result Date: Sep. 20, 2010 | Filing Date: Jan. 1, 1900 |

Case number: BC414842 Settlement –  $950,000 Settlement Fund

Court

L.A. Superior Central West


Attorneys

Plaintiff

Steven L. Lezell

Sean P. Reis
(Reis Law Firm APC)


Defendant

Raoul D. Kennedy
(Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom LLP)

Scott J. Carr

Anthony J. Dreyer


Facts

A class action was filed against Helio LLC by Samuel Vanover on behalf of similarly situated individuals, regarding flat-rate early termination fees.

Settlement class members included all current and former Helio customers who, at any time prior to Oct. 4, 2010, were under a contract with Helio that contained the early termination fee (ETF) provision.

Contentions

PLAINTIFF'S CONTENTIONS:
The class contended that the $175 flat-rate termination fees constitute unjust enrichment and was violative of the California Consumer Legal Remedies Act, California Civil Code Section 1671, and California's Unfair Competition Law.

DEFENDANT'S CONTENTIONS:
Helio denied any wrongdoing.

Result

The parties reached a settlement, under which Helio established a $950,000 fund for the payment of refunds to members of the settling class. Customers were qualified to receive a portion of the settlement amount if they were under contract with Helio at any time prior to Oct. 4, 2010 and the contract had an ETF provision, whether or not a member paid any portion of the ETF to Helio or any third party collection agency. Settlement class members were eligible to received a cash award of $10 or a refund equal to the difference between the flat-rate ETF they paid and what they would have paid had the ETF been pro-rated. In reaching the settlement, Helio made no admission of liability.


#99998

For reprint rights or to order a copy of your photo:

Email jeremy@reprintpros.com for prices.
Direct dial: 949-702-5390