The Supreme Court has made substantial changes to administrative law, including overruling the Chevron doctrine and restrictin...

The cases of “When They See Us,” “Inventing Anna,” and “Baby Reindeer” highlight the challenges studios face in balancing ente...

Not too long ago, Japan had a shortage of attorneys, which hindered access to justice for the poor and affected the country’s ...

The prevalence of fake documents in U.S. courts, particularly those presented by Iranians, is alarmingly high. Attorneys are r...

This move comes after the adoption of SB 743, which changed the methodology for examining the significance of transportation i...

The US Supreme Court has ruled that the statute of limitations for challenging an administrative regulation begins when the pl...

California recognizes that a defendant owes a duty of care for injuries that occur on property which it does not own when the ...

The recent U.S. Supreme Court decision in ...

In Loper Bright Enterprises v. Raimondo, the court split along ideological lines. The majority rejected the Chevron doc...

Third-party carriers use outside organizations to negotiate lower medical bills with healthcare providers without informing th...

The tools honed through advancing Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion (DEI) equip mediators to guide disputing parties toward eff...

The NCAA has agreed to a $2.8 billion settlement in a class action lawsuit, which will establish a fund to compensate current ...

While tax law doesn’t explicitly mandate amending a tax return after errors are discovered, the IRS advises on when an amended...

A court must find that the employer intentionally created or knowingly permitted working conditions to exist that were so into...

The Consumer Financial Protection Bureau has issued a final rule that creates a public registry for certain nonbank financial ...

The remand trial will have to decide what were Trump’s unofficial acts and whether they constituted a crime or crimes. The cas...

The U.S. Supreme Court has upheld the administrative agencies’ authority but has imposed a stricter requirement for justifying...

The Supreme Court’s ruling in Jarkesy v. SEC, which gave defendants the right to a jury trial before facing monetary pe...

Implementing safeguards and planning ahead when work takes attorneys out on the road or in the air can help reduce their risk ...

In 5th and LA v. Western Waterproofing Company, Inc., the 2nd District Court of Appeal held that a second lawsuit again...

The public should be aware of the sacrifices and consequences of drone warfare, and the courts should be prepared to address t...

Private equity acquisitions of healthcare businesses have been shown to negatively impact quality of care, physician autonomy,...

The Supreme Court’s decision in Moyle v. United States has delayed or avoided ruling on the most critical question pres...

The U.S. Supreme Court has agreed to review the 11th Circuit's recent holding in Stanley v. City of Sanford to address ...

In a 9-0 decision, the Supreme Court took a pass on one internet moderation case, but suggested that the other two are unconst...

The majority’s ruling could allow the government to indirectly censor speech by pressuring social media companies behind the s...

The press has a duty to correct misrepresentations and ensure the public can make informed choices, especially during a presid...

The California Supreme Court left trial courts with substantial discretion to determine if evidence, whether admissible under ...

Earl Rogers, a legendary California trial lawyer, successfully defended numerous individuals in criminal prosecutions. Hiram J...

The California Supreme Court has affirmed a death sentence in People v. Nadey, despite evidence of systemic racial discriminat...