This is the property of the Daily Journal Corporation and fully protected by copyright. It is made available only to Daily Journal subscribers for personal or collaborative purposes and may not be distributed, reproduced, modified, stored or transferred without written permission. Please click "Reprint" to order presentation-ready copies to distribute to clients or use in commercial marketing materials or for permission to post on a website. and copyright (showing year of publication) at the bottom.

Don Willenburg

See more on Don Willenburg

Partner
appellate law, litigation, special master
Gordon & Rees LLP

1111 Broadway Ste 1700
Oakland , CA 94607
Phone: (510) 463-8600
Fax: (510) 984-1721
Email: dwillenburg@grsm.com

Stanford Univ Law School



Columns
Title Category Published
Ramirez: responding to restrictions on the affirmative use of PMQ testimony Appellate Practice, Law Practice Feb. 8, 2023
Mayday! M’aidez! You shall reconsider your thoughts about “may!” Appellate Practice, Law Practice May 24, 2022
When is ‘each defendant’ not ‘every defendant’? Under Prop 51 California Supreme Court, Civil Litigation, Torts/Personal Injury Aug. 19, 2020
You do not forfeit an objection you didn’t have California Supreme Court Mar. 11, 2020
State Supreme Court ‘clarifies’ expert witnesses and hearsay California Supreme Court Mar. 3, 2020
Legal innovation report: part promising, part unexceptionable State Bar & Bar Associations, Law Practice Aug. 23, 2019
Anti-SLAPP appeals: extensions and civility are not bad faith Appellate Practice, California Courts of Appeal, Civil Litigation Feb. 7, 2018
Product liability decision hits hard, but may not reach far Appellate Practice, California Supreme Court, Civil Litigation Jan. 17, 2018
What happens in Vegas might be resolved by a California court Perspective Feb. 2, 2017
Hearsay ruling will affect civil cases, too Perspective Aug. 4, 2016
Prenatal limitations statute circuit split Perspective Jun. 11, 2016
E-filing is coming to superior courts Litigation May 18, 2016

Verdicts & Settlements
Case Name Topic Role Published
Rogan O'Handley v. Alex Padilla, et al. Constitutional Law Defendant Nov. 4, 2022
Timothy C. Nelson v. City of Davis, et al. Civil Rights Defendant Sep. 21, 2013
Title Category Published
Ramirez: responding to restrictions on the affirmative use of PMQ testimony Appellate Practice, Law Practice Feb. 8, 2023
Mayday! M’aidez! You shall reconsider your thoughts about “may!” Appellate Practice, Law Practice May 24, 2022
When is ‘each defendant’ not ‘every defendant’? Under Prop 51 California Supreme Court, Civil Litigation, Torts/Personal Injury Aug. 19, 2020
You do not forfeit an objection you didn’t have California Supreme Court Mar. 11, 2020
State Supreme Court ‘clarifies’ expert witnesses and hearsay California Supreme Court Mar. 3, 2020
Legal innovation report: part promising, part unexceptionable State Bar & Bar Associations, Law Practice Aug. 23, 2019
Anti-SLAPP appeals: extensions and civility are not bad faith Appellate Practice, California Courts of Appeal, Civil Litigation Feb. 7, 2018
Product liability decision hits hard, but may not reach far Appellate Practice, California Supreme Court, Civil Litigation Jan. 17, 2018
What happens in Vegas might be resolved by a California court Perspective Feb. 2, 2017
Hearsay ruling will affect civil cases, too Perspective Aug. 4, 2016
Prenatal limitations statute circuit split Perspective Jun. 11, 2016
E-filing is coming to superior courts Litigation May 18, 2016
Case Name Topic Role Published
Rogan O'Handley v. Alex Padilla, et al. Constitutional Law Defendant Nov. 4, 2022
Timothy C. Nelson v. City of Davis, et al. Civil Rights Defendant Sep. 21, 2013